FTX1 – KK4Z

Black Rock Mtn State Park – Aug 2025

Last weekend I finished up a 3-day, 1,800 mile, 7-state POTA Rove that included a radio trade. Out with the FTX1 and in with a TS-590sg. After setting up the 590, I brought it with me to Black Rock Mountain State Park to try some FT8 and if the band conditions permit, a little CW.

I arrived at the Park Friday afternoon. I have done this enough times that I am setup and ready to go within 30 minutes. This campsite had some challenges.It was the smallest campsite I ever used. I had space for the trailer and I had to park my truck in the picnic area. I also had overhead power lines so I had to use a shorter antenna. The weather was cool for a change and I didn’t have to run my A/C.

Setup was a Chameleon Micro Hybrid transformer with a 12’ whip and about a 20’ counterpoise. The radio was my new-to-me Kenwood TS-590sg. This was the radio’s maiden voyage and I really liked it. It performed well. One of the main reasons I like running big radios at low power is more of the controls are readily available. Most everything in the TS-590sg is either a push button or a twist of a knob away. Having a high performance receiver isn’t any good if you can’t get to the controls.

Band conditions were poor. The first night I only made 88 FT-8 contacts and they were a struggle. At times the band would “white-out”, high noise and only white snow on the waterfall. At the better times QSB or fading was a constant up and down. I would watch S7-9 signals drop to nothing during a QSO. Saturday afternoon brought a power failure at the park. Yep, right during mid QSO. The power was still out at 1800 hrs, so I had a decision to make – should I stay, or should I go. As you get older one of the things that goes, is your night vision. If I was going to leave it had to be soon, so I could still do most of my driving during daylight/evening hours. I decided to go. Since I have a lot of practice setting up and tearing down. I was packed up in less than 30 minutes. As I was pulling out of the park, the power returned. Better safe than sorry.

I ended up with 233 contacts, 88 short of my kilo for that park. I will plan another trip in the fall to finish. I am real happy with the TS-590sg. I opened it up and found the MARS mod already done and the TXCO installed. The radio performed well and I ran it mostly at 20 watts. As you can see in the QSO map, Most of my contacts were CONUS. Kenwoods and Icoms have the best ergonomics. I feel the layouts were designed by people who use their radios; that ergonomics were a primary concern and not an afterthought.

I also decided to trade off the FT-710 and ended up with a pristine IC-7200. I always wanted one but the stars never aligned — until now. I no longer have any Yaesu radios in the stable and probably won’t have any more. Why? A couple of reasons. I prefer the ergonomics of the Icoms and the Kenwoods. Everything I need is right there on the front panel. Easy, to see — Easy to use. I have owned a FTDX10, FT-710, and a FTX1, along with an Icom IC-7610, IC-7300, and a Kenwood TS-890s. I can tell you that whatever I hear on one radio, I can hear on the other. There’s two reasons for this. One is knowing where the controls are and two is knowing how to use them. There is a third factor the CSP unit, that’s Cerebral Signal Processing Unit. Half of the battle is using the CSP to process faint signals. After 30 years, mine is pretty good.

The Yaesu radios, are not bad radios, they are not my cup of tea. I can squeeze more horsepower out of the Icoms and the Kenwoods. I am sure there are those who can say the same about Yaesus. I at least crossed the fence and tried them but in the end my preference is not Yaesu. YMMV.

Other happenings. I rearranged my Go Box. My TS-590sg will not fit in it like my other radios so I got an Apache case for it from Harbor Freight and moved some antenna stuff into the Go Box. So now all my radios travel in a separate case and my Go Box has become universal. Everything I need to run any of my field radios is in the Go Box. These days I do more FunComm than EmComm, but I am always prepared to do either. I load the same stuff and off I go. I’ve had a busy summer and the honey-do list is growing, there is lots to do around the ranch so this may be one of the last trips for a while. I do most of my outdoor work from Fall to Spring to avoid working in the southeast hot, humid summers and the accompanying chiggers and ticks. That’s all for now, take care and 73 de Scott

A Road Trip and a New Radio

Road Trip! I love the sound of that. I am taking an impromptu road trip north and turning it into a POTA Rove. I put my FTX1 up for trade on QTH.com and very quickly got a good trade offer for a Kenwood TS-590sg. I have always wanted one of those. A nice simple radio that is robust and easy to operate. I am going to add it to my field radio collection.

Some of you know I have a penchant for operating big radios at low power. I don’t have to worry about overheating and I like that the controls I use most are easy to get to. Most of the time my field work is either in my micro camper or at a nearby park picnic table. Weight is not an issue. I normally operate at about 20 watts. Sometimes as high as 30-35 depending on band conditions. I don’t need more than that.

My adventure starts Friday afternoon as I head towards Indiana. I’ll stop somewhere for the night around dark and then pick it up the next day. I plan on stopping at a park in Ohio and then a park in Indiana to add those two to my activation list. Michigan, another needed State is nearby and I hope to add that one to the list. From there I will generally head east and see what mischief I can get into.

Gear for the trip was my IC-7300 and LDG tuner. The antenna was a Chameleon 17’ stainless steel whip and a Chameleon CHA Hybrid Micro Balun sitting on top of a carbon fiber tripod. Counterpoise was a Chameleon wire with about 20-22’ used. Since this was a shoot and scoot trip I used FT8 with my Lenovo T14 Thinkpad. I brought a 100 amp/hr LiPo battery for the radio with a Bioenno BPP-160 for the laptop. I ran the radio from the backseat and the laptop on the center console from the drivers seat. Setup and teardown only took a few minutes. I collapsed the antenna and stuck it in the back seat when I was done. Slam, Bam, Thankyou Ma’am.

Friday night I stopped in Lexington KY, for the night and I was on the road by 6 AM the next morning. My fist stop was Lake Laramie State Park in Minster, OH. The GPS put me at the back of the park and I had a nice clearing by the lake to myself. It took a while to get my 15 contacts ( I always get spares). Band conditions were up and down like a roller coaster. After working out a few kinks to my setup, I packed up and headed toward Indiana. The trip was mostly county roads and highways. The scenery was beautiful passed through farmland with corn as far as the eye can see. I also passed through some Amish communities and was treated to traditional horse and buggies on the road.

My next Park was Ouabache State Park in Bluffton, IN. I found a little spot in a picnic area and set up shop. Again, the band conditions were not that good and I was glad I was running FT8. After completing my contacts, I packed up and headed for New Haven, IN were my trade was to take place. I arrived on time and after chatting with my trading partner we were both satisfied with the trade and once again I was on the road heading toward Michigan.

Coldwater State Park is a hunting preserve. When I got there, there was no infrastructure. Just a parking area and bulletin board. I was alone and in about an hour I was on the road again.

This was leg of the trip was a long one. I spent the night in Zanesville, OH and the next morning found me heading for southwestern Pennsylvania. The park I chose was Ryerson Station State Park. This park was nestled in the Allegheny Mountains with twisty-turney, uppy-downy roads both into and out of the area. There was no cell service for miles. It took me a little longer to get my contacts but I succeeded. From there is was a short hop to Picketts Fort State Park in Fairmont, West Virginia. This was a nice park and I found a shaded spot in a picnic area. This was a hot weekend and at some of the parks, I operated with the A/C running. At Picketts, I rolled down the windows.

Leaving Picketts, it was a long haul to Hungry Mother State Park in Marion Virginia. This park while still being in the mountains was more open and the contacts came easier. From there I drove to Statesville, North Carolina and spent the night. The next morning I was up early and drove 8 miles to Lake Norman State Park, my shortest hop. I found a spot down by the lake and made my contacts fairly quickly. Back on the road for the last 5 hour drive back to the home QTH.

I now have activated 17 States. I was a fast and fun trip but while my mind was willing, the body not so much. At 68 it’s probably time to start slowing down a bit. I am at the point where to activate a new state it is a one to two day drive just to get there.

So why is the FTX1 leaving? To start off with, it is not a bad radio. I have two other small radios, an IC-705 and a KX2. Between the FTX1 and IC-705, my preference is for the 705. It is more in line with the way I operate. Plus, as I have said earlier, I mostly use big radios so having 3 small radios is a bit superfluous. The FTX1 is off to a new home and I get another big radio for the field.

When I got home, I did hook the TS-590sg up and played around for a few minutes. The radio is easy to use and on CW the relays are super quiet. The controls are fairly intuitive and easy to use. I am going to bring this radio on my next outing. Over the next couple of days, I will go over it and set it up to my liking. Don’t forget to check out my video, and thanks for stopping by. 73 de Scott

The FTX1 Cover Up

One of the things I was concerned about the FTX1 was how to protect its face while in transit. The Yaesu side rails which are not yet available are too large. They make the radio too bulky. Icom, when they made the IC-705 available also released a STL file so we could make our own covers which I did. Actually, I modified the file and my son printed it on his 3D printer.

The other day, I decided to check to see if someone had made a STL file for a FTX1 cover. They did! I downloaded the file and sent it to my son who printed it out for me (19 hours). The file was unmodified and fit the FTX1 to a tee. The file can be found here: Yaesu FTX1 3D Cover

I will wrap a silicone rubber band around it to keep the radio secure in the cover. The cover weighs 6.5 oz and the whole weighs just over 4 lbs without the rubber band. For comparison, My IC-705 with cover weighs in at just under 3 lbs.

Another annoyance or at least a distraction is during CW transmit. On the FTX1 the frequency readout flashes in time to CW along with the xmit light above the main dial. It is rather bright. I shot a YouTube video showing the difference between the FTX1 and the IC-705.

Where does this leave me. Well, for one thing wondering what Yaesu was thinking. I’m not giving up on the radio, hopefully as time goes by, Yaesu will work out some of the kinks. I am a bit annoyed that Yaesu is using us as beta testers. I would expect that from a company like Xeigu which sells their radios for less than half the price of the FTX1. The FTX1 is supposed to be a premium radio at a premium price. Come on Yaesu, you can do better. I think Yaesu had an opportunity and missed the mark. As I said in a prior post, I have been very busy this summer. Hopefully soon, I will get the FTX1 out in the field. So far, as of today if I had to choose between the FTX1 and the IC-705, I would still choose the IC-705 for a QRP radio. For a full size radio, I would take the IC-7300 or the FT-710 over the FTX1 Optima. Of course, your mileage may vary. Thanks for stopping by. 72 de Scott

Busy Summer

It’s been a busy summer for me. I had a lot of to-do and honey-do things to take care of. My wife’s best friends husband was killed in a car crash and she drove to Louisiana and helped with the arrangements. She was gone 10 days. That left me home with our special needs daughter. Not much me time.

Today I cruised over to the Yaesu website to see if there was an update for the FTx1 and there was. I was home alone and took the opportunity to update the firmware. Since I had the radio on my desk I decided to make a few CW contacts and give my new paddles from Modern Morse a try. I hooked up the FTX1 to my 270′ OCF dipole and fired up Hamrs Pro on the computer. It’s been a while since I operated and I was a little shaky, but hey, this is for fun right. I made about half a dozen contacts before I had to move on to other things. It was fun and felt good to get on the air again with CW. I am hoping to take a mini rove within the next month or two.

The radio did fine. It hears well. Probably on par with my IC-705 and KX2.The CW relays are a little loud and the screen flashes in cadence with the CW being sent. It takes a little getting used to, it can be distracting. The menus are still a little quirky, I prefer the ergonomics of my Icoms, but again it’s not a deal breaker.

The paddles are great, they are a little pricey, but I had no trouble using them. I held the paddles in my left hand and sent with my right. The action is nice and smooth. I have large hands and this paddle is larger than my N0SA SOTA paddles; they are easier to hold.

The FTX1’s audio is good once you get it adjusted. Up the treble quite a bit, up the Mid a little and take a lot out of the bass. There is plenty of volume even for us hard of hearing types.

I have some advice about computers. I mainly use Apple products for most of my computer work. I have a couple of Windows machines I use for Amateur Radio. I always hear people complaining about Windows automatically updating at an inopportune time. The solution is easy. You pick a time during the week and update manually when you or the machine are not busy. I update mine about once a week or before an event like a POTA activation or Field Day. I also don’t fiddle with the OS much. My machines run extremely well. Let them do their job.

It is hot, hot, hot here in Georgia. The heat along with the humidity can make things miserable. My eastern European blood has a low tolerance for the heat so I get my outside work done in the mornings. Everyone be careful in this heat, this time of year it can reach dangerous levels. Y’all stay safe and 72 de Scott

Dear Yaesu, New Paddles, and Life on the Farm

Dear Yaesu,
What has happened? Have you forgotten us? I don’t understand your thinking when it comes to the FTX1. The FT-817 and its variants sold well for over 20 years. It is still a cherished radio and has a strong following. The FTX1 is an okay radio. It would appear to compete with the IC-705 and as I have said, it doesn’t really compare. In the realm of QRP radios the IC-705 is still better then the FTX1.

I think many of us were hoping for an improved FT-817/FT-818. The FT-817 had a nice form factor and only weighed ~2.5 lbs with a battery and antenna. The FTX1 is clunky and weighs ~4 pounds without an antenna. I still haven’t figured out the best way to carry it.

What would be a nice QRP radio? My suggestion is taking the form factor of the FT-891 and making it a 10 watt radio (20 might even be better). Replace the the 100 watt finals with a battery or a decent antenna tuner (10:1 matching?). You could even go so far as make it an SDR radio. Make a nice pouch with a shoulder strap to carry it. Most people who run QRP don’t have a need for a waterfall. Instead use the USB port to send the signal to a a tablet/cell phone/laptop to view the waterfall there. You can also allow connectivity to a tablet/cell phone/laptop for digital modes and logging. That might put you on top again.

I don’t understand the Optima option. ~$1,900. Right now, I can get a FT-710 for $955. That would leave almost $1,000 for another radio or two. The FT-710 is a better radio. I have an FT-710 and I think it is one of your better efforts. I recently used it for Field day and it did very well. I have an FTX1 and I’m keeping it for a while to see what you do with it.

Yes, I have a preference for Icom radios, they work better for me. I have had other Yaesu radios namely FTDX10, FTDX3000, FT-950 and years ago an FT-817. I also run a Kenwood. I use what works best for me. I am not necessarily bashing you, I am offering my opinion for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Scott KK4Z

Note: right now I am not sure how the FTX1 fits into my lineup. As I said earlier, I think the IC-705 is better (at least for me YMMV). If I need something lighter I have a KX2. For Field Days and bigger events I can bring either an FT-710 or IC-7300. When I purchased this radio I was also looking at a KX3 with KXAT3 and KXFL3. Maybe if the right trade comes along…

Working on the farm.
I have been busy on my property. I have 6 acres to take care of and there is always something to do. Right now I have to start getting firewood ready for winter. That means dragging downed trees to the process area, bucking, splitting and stacking. I have a John Deere 3025 tractor to help me out. A problem I was running into was how do I get my gear out to where I am working. The front end loader is okay to carry things until you need it for something else. Besides the steel of the bucket is not good for a chainsaw blade. In the past I would sometimes use my wife’s UTV. That has it’s own set of problems namely, she uses it for her stuff and it stays full. So I decided to build a cargo box for the 3 point hitch on my tractor. I got a carry-all from King Cutter which allows me to use my iMatch quick hitch.

I stopped by my local welder and had a 2″ receiver welded on along with some grab hooks. The finished project looks like this.

I can flip the tailgate up and turn it into a workbench.

I drilled a few holes so I can mount a chainsaw vise to sharpen my chainsaw in the field.

You can see the chainsaw sheath behind the vise. It will hold my 68cc chainsaw with a 27″ bar safely.

I use a 20′ shipping container for my maintenance shed. It’s hasn’t been reorganized since we initially filled it up almost 6 years ago. Another project is to get things in the shop sorted and non-essential stuff moved to one of our other outbuildings. I need to make it more of a workshop and less of a storage shed. There are always projects to work on.

New Paddles
I just received a new set of paddles from Modern Morse. I haven’t taken them out to the field yet, but in house testing shows them to be very promising. They are asy to grip, comfortable in the hand and have a very smooth touch. Workmanship is superb. The paddle body and the arms are Ceracoated and the finger pieces appear to be passivated. The arms pivot on 4 small ball bearings and tension is magnetic. There is a switch inside the paddle to switch dit-dah polarity. This is nice for left handers or “booby-footed” right handers. You can now plug and play with any radio. The paddles come in a nice metal case and two hex keys. The smaller key adjusts the tension and contact spacing and the larger one is for the 4 crews that holds the top of the case to the bottom. The paddle mechanism is sealed with a plastic lid. to get to the switch, you have to loosen the four bolts and carefully lift the top off. Be careful as there are tiny washers on the paddle arm pivots. Another nice feature is the paddles come with 4 magnets on the bottom.

The colors have a nice retro feel and are pleasant to look at. They will certainly be easy to find in a pack or on the ground if dropped. The paddles fit nicely in my hand and I have no trouble sending. These are rugged paddles designed for field use. They are made in the USA by a Veteran. The first run is sold out and there will be a pause before the next run is available. You can check the status here https://www.modernmorse.com. These paddles are pricey but if you appreciate the feel of fine workmanship, they are worth it. I am happy with mine.

Final
Summer got busy and hot. Hopefully as fall approaches I will have more time to get my radios out in the field. I did manage to make it to Field Day with my club and my FT-710. I thought retirement was for leisure but I have never been busier. So much to do, so little time. 73 de Scott

IC-705 vs FTX1 receiver part 3

To some, this part of the test is where the rubber meets the road. For this portion I hooked both radios up to the same antenna and used an A/B switch to go back and forth between the radios. The signal source came from this morning’s CWops CWtest, a weekly one hour sprint. many of the signals are under 500 Hz apart and there are usually weak and strong signals in the mix.

I recorded about 5 minutes of the CWtest switching the radios back and forth approximately every 30 seconds. I made a YouTube video which I will post below. While I was recording I sat directly behind my iPhone so keep that in mind that my comments are from live first hand experience.

Receiver. Before the test, I had both radios turned on and attached to the antenna. When switched to the IC-705, I could hear faint CW signals even though the S-meter or the waterfall were not showing any indication of a signal. When I switched over to the FTX1, I couldn’t hear the signal. generally speaking, I feel that the IC-705 has a slightly lower noise floor than the FTX1. Both radios have good receivers and it would take an experienced ear to make use of the lower noise floor.

Filtering. I set the radios up the same: CW mode, no RF gain, DNR set to 2, filter width set to 250 Hz, and waterfall to 5K on each side. When the test started, I found a weak signal that had a strong signal next to it, approx. 300-500 Hz away. Both radios did a very good job even though both had some filter ringing. The desired signal was still clear and easy to copy. About halfway through, I swapped and found a strong signal with a weak signal nearby. The weak signal was about 300-500 Hz away. this time there was no ringing and the desired signal was easy to copy. Both radios performed about the same.

Audio. The FTX1 has more audio, that’s the best way I can put. It is louder, and sounds more full than the IC-705. To my ear, the audio port design, volume, and frequency response appear to be geared toward SSB and FM. However, the CW signals out of the IC-705 sounded clearer and more distinct. This may due to the smaller speaker acting more like a tweeter making the higher pitched CW signals sound clear. The FTX1’s CW sounded a little muffled. For me, when I operate CW I am usually wearing headphones or earbuds.

Summary. Performance wise, you can’t go wrong with either radio. If you are the audiophile type, the FTDX1 might be a better choice. CW ops might like the IC-705 better. I will post the YouTube video below once I get it uploaded.

FTX1 vs IC-705 Connectivity

This morning I wanted to explore connectivity with the FTX1 and the IC-705. Right off the bat, the IC-705 comes standard with Bluetooth and GPS while the FTX1 requires a separate purchase for each. The Bluetooth unit cost $55 and the GPS cost $70. the IC-705 has one additional feature in that it also acts as a Wifi access point to allow you to control the radio via iPhone/iPad apps like SDR-Control SDR Control Website. With this app I can operate FT8 and CW. It has message memory and logging. The Wifi on the IC-705 is not intended for internet connection.

Getting back to the FTX1, it took a little figuring but I got it running FT8 on my Windows machine. The FTX1 is so new that there isn’t any control configurations out there on apps like WSJT. A little tinkering and I got it to work just fine. Here are the setting I used.

You want to use the enhanced com port. I also ended up using a USB C to USB A cable instead of a USB C to USB C. I was having trouble getting the latter to work and it may have been something on my part to cause it not to work. I will fool with it some more later.

UPDATE: I was able to get the radio to work with a USB C to USB C cable. However, something I missed was while WSJT software will Xmit and Receive, it will not QSY the frequency on the FTX1. I tried this with FT-891, FT-991, and FTDX10 CAT Command sets in WSJT. Usually with Icom’s there is enough compatibility between the radios that the CAT setting from one model will work with another. An example would be the IC-7610, it is pretty cross compatible with the IC-7300 command set. Hopefully this will be addressed soon.

On the IC-705 you can output GPS data through the B port. This can be used for different things, I use it sync the time on my laptop when I am using one. As far as I can see this feature is not planned for the Yaesu.

The Yaesu is still brand new, I had it 2 days and there was already an update. I am sure as the product matures, more features will be added. I like the radio; it has a certain fun factor. If someone asked me today, if I could only have one, I would pick the IC-705. But that is today, tomorrow as the FTX1 is refined, I may change my mind. In between, I plan on having fun with both. 72 de Scott

Why I didn’t Preorder the Yaesu FTX1

As information started coming out about Yaesu’s new QRP radio I was tempted to get one. However, the more I learned the less I liked about it. I have an Icom IC-705 and an Elecraft KX2 for QRP radios. My big field radios are an Icom IC-7300 and Yaesu FT-710F. I am looking for another QRP radio to do a long term review. I considered the FTX1 but gave it a pass for the following reasons.

Price. An IC-705 cost $1349.95 at HRO. The FTX1 cost $1499.95 but to be truly compatible with the IC-705, you have to add Bluetooth ($54.95) and GPS ($69.95). this brings the total to $1624.85. A spare battery for the FTX1 is $199.95. The Icom battery (BP-307) is $135.95; however, knockoffs on Amazon can be had for 2 for $59.95. I use them and they seem to work just fine. Another point are the antenna tuners. The AH-705 sells for $359.95 and can tune long wire and coax fed antennas. Yaesu chose a different path they have one tuner for coax fed antennas and one for long wire each costing $319.95 or $639.90 for both.

The optima package. It cost $1899.95 to give you a 100 watt option. To put this in perspective, you can buy a FT-710 Field for $884.95 and a FTM-510 for $499.95 for a total of $1384.90. Plus you get an antenna tuner included with the FT-710 and the 710 probably has better performance than the FTX1 on HF. As a side note, the FT-991A sells for $1229.95.

Performance. Yaesu was pretty mum about the performance of the FTX1. With the FTDX101, FTDX10, and FT-710, they touted the Rob Sherwood numbers long and loud. The only thing they said about the FTX1 was it had the same Analog to Digital Converter (ADC) as the FTDX10. ADC’s are all pretty similar in all of the SDR radios. So where does the FTX1 fall? Is it like the FT-710 or is it more like the FT-991A or the FT-891? For POTA and SOTA using SSB this is probably fine Rob Sherwood recommends a Dynamic Range Narrow Spaced number of 80 dB for contesting. For CW that number increases to 90dB. The FT-891 and the FT-991 are in the 70’s range.

My friend Thomas K4SWL who is attending Hamvention put his hands on a live FTX1. His first impression was it was much bigger than he imagined. He decided to cancel his reservation for a FTX1. Looking at how things attached to the radio, I had the same thoughts. If I am going that large, I’ll bring my IC-7300 or my FT-710F. I am curious about the current draw of the FTX1 at idle.

As folks get their hands on the radio, more details will come out. Hopefully Yaesu will be more forthcoming with information, we shall see. It seems to me that Yaesu did not listen to the QRP/POTA/SOTA community when building this radio. For sure the pricing and size seem out of whack. As for me, I am still looking for another radio to review, but at this time I will give the FTX1 a pass. 73 de Scott